Home

donald duck writing

gify.com

 

Another piece that I will toss to the circular file once I save it to the blog because I have an in with its friendly editor. It’s not bad, but as I type it up, I’ m noting that it’s a bit forced. I did a lot of experimenting in the good old days. I’m not writing as much fiction as non-fiction now, but it wasn’t a waste of thought. Even non-fiction needs to make the story and the characters involved interesting.

I’ve been a reader a great deal longer than I’ve wanted to write. I haven’t always known I wanted to write, but I’ve always wanted to read.

I’ve enjoyed fairy tales. And how comforting they were. No matter how gory and violent, you could generally read on knowing that the good guys would win in the end and that unlike real life, justice could always be counted on to prevail.

I could always count on children’s literature too. The Famous Five, The Secret Seven, Black Beauty, Anne of Green Gables worked to a certain formula; bad guys, adventure and a happy ending.

Then there were The Classics. That’s what they’re called because we don’t know where exactly to pigeonhole them. Victor Hugo, Jane Austin, Charles Dickens, Jonathan Swift opened a window for me to style, social commentary and the human condition and historical documentary.

They wrote personal stories set against their own contemporary or recent historical background. Their work influenced and entertained theirs and later generations. The reader is informed about social conditions and entertained. Above all, entertained. Sometimes on a personal level, justice and the good guys still win out. You could go away with an understanding of the suffering of the poorer classes, or the foibles of the upper middle classes, but you wouldn’t have the moral shoved down your throat. It said what it said and allowed you to work it out for yourself.

Genre fiction too, is like the fairy tale experience; the good yarn, the happy ending, the story. Sure, language and characterisation and a social message are sometime sacrificed, but having grown up on a diet of tales, I think I’d prefer the story to the language if I can’t have both. But that’s not always the case. Harlan Ellison wrote a better story about a nagging Jewish mother ghost than Wooden Allen ever will or could. His fiction is sharp, incisive and imaginative and his non-fiction uncompromising in its defence of his craft. The intelligentsia, because of his witty turn of phrase has deemed Raymond Chandler’s work worthy of getting a literary star.

But there’s a 20th century construct called ‘the plot is sketchy but it’s well written and a wonderful character study.’ Personally I don’t see the point. As an aspiring writer talking to her colleagues, I know that it’s trite to say that I love the taste, the scent and the texture of words. But I love it that Zola used only 26 letters to get Dreyfuss acquitted and I love it that ‘moonlight and love songs are never out of date.’ But I don’t see the point of playing with language and characterisation at the expense of plot and story. There are exceptions. There are always exceptions. I love Dorothy Parker’s very personal diatribe on the human condition. It’s a very telling and entertaining if you’re in a particular mood. And Ephraim Kishon’s gentle satires are on anything and everything universal. Most are timeless and boundaryless.

I’m not qualified to talk about contemporary literature. Friends shove a book my way now and gain and I try, but I think today’s work is too conscientiously literary for my taste. Perhaps I’m not interested in the South American condition, perhaps it’s because there are too many literary allusions, metaphors and myths and symbols packed in them for my liking.

So, what the hell influences my writing? I don’t know, but I think for me it’s more about trying to get inspiration than being influenced. I get it wherever I can. I have the cover of a Phillip Jose Farmer novel (Phillip typing surrounde4d by his characters) propped on my desk to remind me that I want interesting characters. I have a print of Bob Dylan on the wall just above my computer because life and art should be about lyric sound and social causes. I read Harry Harrison because he ‘learned (6) new languages, lived in new cultures, responded to new realities, ideas, experiences.’ And because believes that Life becomes art; art becomes life. One shapes the other always, forcefully and immutably.’ I think that because my life has shaped me so immutably I’m not likely to travel or to learn six new languages, but I’m trying to open myself up to new experiences and revisit old ones to learn from them.

I re-read Dickens to crack the code of the plot, sub-plot and characterisation I rea-read Oscar Wilde for his original prose and listen to the wit of Noel Coward’s songs. I don’t know how much good it will all do me, but I might as well be inspired by the best.

 

 

 

Advertisements

15 thoughts on “On being inspired to write

  1. People are surprised when I say I’m not an avid book reader, and when I do, it’s usually nonfiction. One thing for sure, there is plenty for the avid reader, the key is finding the right genre. After all, everything isn’t for everybody – thus one size doesn’t fit all.

    • It’s not about finding the right genre but falling into it after trying everything else. 🙂 I’ll read anything except porn. It’s interesting about the non fiction. I’ve noticed that men prefer it, including my sons and grandsons. So glad you dropped in.

  2. I like reading everything. I do find the more complicated I will only read once in a blue moon. I think that is because in grade school I was required to read the complicated as part of challenging me because I did well in English so I had extra assignments. I remember reading Frankenstein and did enjoy it until I had to answer the complicated questions the teacher gave me. LOL. I didn’t want to think about the deep thoughts I wanted to enjoy what I read. 🙂 This continued through 9th grade and then 10th was no more English but more literature and mythology. I do own several classic novels and will eventually read them because I should. 🙂 As always you write beautifully. I think my imagination sparks my writing. 🙂

    • Thanks Jules. I remember loving The Thin Man until I had to analyse it for school. I can’t stand it now.
      It’s safe to read those classics, Jules. Reading should always be for pleasure. (I can never read The Thin Man again or watch that movie. I shudder at the thought. 🙂 )

  3. “But I don’t see the point of playing with language and characterisation at the expense of plot and story.”—I’m with you. I want to get drawn into a story. I need strong characters too, but without a story for them to be involved in, my mind will start to wander.

  4. take a look at SouthPacific..only read the first page. That’s a great writer. American author James A. Michener. He’s already captured your attention. Tap into your raw emotion. Write a book like….one…you want to READ! That’s the ultimate challenge, wouldn’t you agree?

      • Depends on your audience Mary. I follow a blog called Curnblog; it’s about cinema. I think it’s a pretty popular blog but the fine details and points of discussion are usually at a depth that doesn’t interest me. Yet there are many followers who must like exactly this type of discussion. I don’t think ‘poncy’ is a fair description at all of your post Mary. I’m sure there are many others who will appreciate your detailed sentiments, they just don’t know they are there.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s